바카라사이트♐-카지노하는곳-•마카오 환전『토토 사이트 총판』⇙（무료바둑이게임）▫필리핀 카지노 현황✣바카라 타이┱파칭코▫바카라 게임방법♫루비게임바둑이
The governments of more than 190 nations seven luck , aimed at reducing global greenhouse gas emissions and thus avoiding the threat of dangerous climate change.
바카라사이트♮-더킹카지노-┾마카오 환전『바카라 마틴』™（강원 랜드 여자 앵벌이）▄카지노 대박 후기➸사설 토토 먹튀☃7 포커 게임✖온카 먹튀⇪마카오 카지노 호텔
Current commitments on greenhouse gas emissions run out in 2020, so at Paris governments are expected to produce an agreement on what happens for the decade after that at least, and potentially beyond.
바카라사이트↥-솔레어카지노-╩마카오 환전『바카라사이트 쿠폰』➷（놀이터 사이트）↼바카라 페어テ바다이야기 릴게임⇩바카라 보는곳★룰렛 시스템배팅↼마카오 카지노 게임 종류
Scientists have warned that if greenhouse gas emissions continue to rise, we will pass the threshold beyond which global warming becomes catastrophic and irreversible. That threshold is estimated as a temperature rise of 2C above pre-industrial levels, and on current emissions trajectories 카지노사이트 . That may not sound like much, but the temperature difference between today’s world and the last ice age was about 5C, so seemingly small changes in temperature can mean big differences for the Earth.
바카라사이트┍-바카라하는곳-♂마카오 환전『카지노 잭팟』⇥（바카라사이트주소）™카지노 쿠폰☁카지노 무료 머니⇐카지노 슬롯머신 종류☌세부 카지노♪강남 사설 카지노
They have: global negotiations on climate change have been carrying on for more than 20 years. The history of climate change goes back much further: in the 19th century, physicists theorised about the role of greenhouse gases, chiefly carbon dioxide, in the atmosphere, and several suggested that the warming effect would increase alongside the levels of these gases in the atmosphere. But this was all theoretical.
Only in the past few decades have scientists begun the measurements necessary to establish a relationship between current carbon levels and temperatures, and the science conducted since then f1카지노 : that rising greenhouse gas emissions, arising from our use of fossil fuels and our industries, lead to higher temperatures.
바카라사이트→-캐츠비카지노-❉마카오 환전『바카라 후기』U（무료 포커 게임）ラ바카라사이트주소➺해적게임총판│대만 카지노➼카지노 잭팟녀♨인터넷바둑이
No. Global temperatures have been on a clear upward path. There was a spike in 1998, after which temperatures were lower – 카지노사이트 – that led some climate sceptics to claim that the world was cooling.
바카라사이트카지노 룰렛 전략
But it is important to note that temperatures have not fallen, or stalled – they have continued to rise. Given the variations that characterise our weather systems, a period in which the rate of warming slowed is not unexpected.
For the past two years, the rate of warming seems to have accelerated again , but little can be construed from that.
바카라사이트ル-더킹카지노-▪마카오 환전『도박 합법 국가』ο（해외 카지노 사이트） 홀덤천국☼무료 충전 바다 이야기⇋마카오 카지노 후기⇄바카라게임⇗카지노 룰렛 게임
In 1992, governments met in Rio de Janeiro and 온라인바둑이게임 . That agreement, still in force, bound governments to take action to avoid dangerous climate change, but did not specify what actions. Over the following five years, governments wrangled over what each should do, and what should be the role of developed countries versus poorer nations.
Those years of argument produced, in 1997, 천안출장샵 . That pact required worldwide cuts in emissions of about 5%, compared with 1990 levels, by 2012, and each developed country was allotted a target on emissions reductions. But developing countries, including China, South Korea, Mexico and other rapidly emerging economies, were given no targets and allowed to increase their emissions at will.
Al Gore, then US vice-president, signed up to the protocol, but it was quickly apparent that it would never be ratified by the US Congress. Legally, the protocol could not come into force until countries representing 55% of global emissions had ratified it. With the US – then the world’s biggest emitter – on the outside, that was not going to happen.
So for most of the following decade, the Kyoto protocol remained in abeyance and global climate change negotiations ground to a near-halt. But in late 2004, 카지노사이트 – unexpectedly, and as part of a move to have its application for World Trade Organisation membership accepted by the European Union. That made up the weight needed, and the protocol finally came into force.
바카라사이트⇢-우리카지노-①마카오 환전『루비맞고』♝（배터리바둑이주소）╊인터넷바둑이게임┌블랙 잭 카운팅☼해적바둑이게임주소✂무료 양방 프로그램☣룰렛 프로그램
Not quite. The US, under George W Bush, remained firmly outside Kyoto, so although the UN negotiations carried on year after year, the US negotiators were often in different rooms from the rest of the world. It was clear a new approach was needed that could bring the US in, and encourage the major developing economies – especially China, now the world’s biggest emitter – to take on limits to their emissions.
What followed was, 고스톱사이트 an action plan that set the world on the course to a new agreement that would take over from Kyoto.
바카라사이트↪-캐츠비카지노-└마카오 환전『시카고 카지노』ケ（바카라 동호회）☎과일 슬롯 머신↜포유카지노①황금성 먹튀➶온라인바둑이사이트⇢사설 토토 먹튀
It did take a long time. But getting agreement from 196 countries was never going to be easy. The next act of this long-running drama fully demonstrated that: the 바카라사이트 .
바카라사이트✕-우리카지노-✡마카오 환전『토토 검증 사이트』ⓔ（마카오 환치기）マ마카오 환치기♭릴 게임 야마토♣카지노 룰☾마카오 개인 롤링•바카라 규칙
Everything but the treaty. All of the world’s developed countries and the biggest developing countries agreed – for the first time – to limits on their greenhouse gas emissions. This was a landmark, as it meant the world’s biggest emitters were united towards a single goal.
The emissions reductions agreed on were still not enough to meet scientific advice, but they were a big advance on reducing emissions compared with “business as usual”.
But what didn’t happen turned out to be the point that NGOs and many in the press seized on. 카지노사이트 .
바카라사이트⇛-예스카지노-╊마카오 환전『슬롯 머신 게임 다운』♟（국내 카지노 현황）╁루비게임주소»온라인 카지노 먹튀↛강친♮카지노 알 본사ⓞ카지노 먹튀
It depends on your viewpoint. The Kyoto protocol was a beautifully written, watertight, fully legally binding international treaty, a sub-treaty of the similarly binding UNFCCC. But it never met its objectives, because it wasn’t ratified by the US, and not by Russia until it was too late. And 수원출장샵 .
The Copenhagen agreement, on the other hand, was not fully adopted by the UN in 2009 because of last-minute chaos at the conference, though it was ratified the following year 온라인 카지노 총판 . For this reason, the Copenhagen agreement was derided as a failure by green groups.
바카라사이트♀-우리카지노-▫마카오 환전『f1카지노』♟（인터넷바카라사이트）➹에비앙카지노ⓞ마카오 카지노 에이전트☻카지노 광고♂스포츠토토사이트추천↬인터넷바둑이사이트But the targets agreed at Copenhagen, in the form of a document signed by world leaders, still stand.
바카라사이트卐-호텔카지노-┓마카오 환전『룰렛 카지노』└（토토 돈 따는 법）◈에비앙카지노ク홀덤 게임モ룰렛 만들기▫먹튀 커뮤니티¤모바일 야마토
Nations responsible for more than 90% of global emissions have now come up with their targets – 마카오 카지노 여자 . These include all of the major developed and developing countries, though their contributions vary: in the case of developed countries, actual cuts in emissions, but for developing countries a range of targets including limits on emissions compared to “business as usual”, and pledges to increase low-carbon energy or preserve forests.
Analysis of the INDCS, endorsed by the UN, has suggested that 카지노사이트 . That is not quite enough to meet the scientific advice. However, that is not the end of the story. One of the key components of any Paris agreement would be to institute a system of review of the emissions targets every five years, with a view to ratcheting them upwards.
Another, and complementary, approach is to make more effort to bring down emissions outside the UN process, for instance by engaging “non-state actors” such as cities, local governments and businesses to do more.
바카라사이트▶-코인카지노-[마카오 환전『릴 게임 야마토』⊥（카지노 테이블）☻무료 카지노 게임┝텍사스 홀덤 사이트☢온라인바카라게임⇚오락실 슬롯 머신 게임♞고스톱게임
Not at all – the other key question, apart from emissions reductions, is finance. Poorer countries want the rich world to provide them with financial help that will enable them to invest in clean technology to cut their greenhouse gas emissions, and to adapt their infrastructure to the likely damage from climate change.
This is a hugely contentious issue. At Copenhagen, where the finance part of the deal was only sorted out at the very last minute, 온라인카지노 , and they said that by 2020, financial flows of at least $100bn a year would be provided.
As a cornerstone of any Paris agreement, poor countries want assurances that this pledge will be met. That has now been given, in several forms: 바카라사이트 showing that two thirds of the finance required is already being supplied; and dhc2016.xyz showed that the remainder can be made up by increased finance from the World Bank and other development banks, and from the private sector. The World Bank and several governments have already committed to upping their financial assistance, meaning that a clear path towards the 2020 target can now be discerned.
There is more, however. Poor nations also want a similar provision in place beyond 2020, but there is strong disagreement over how this should be done. Some want all the money to come from rich country governments, but those governments are adamant that they will not provide such funding solely from the public purse. They want international development banks, such as the World Bank, to play a role, and they want most of the funding to come from the private sector.
An agreement on this is still possible, but it will be one of the main obstacles to a Paris deal.
바카라사이트╓-카지노하는곳-↺마카오 환전『최소 배팅 2000 원』┗（사설토토사이트추천）☠카지노 여자 앵벌이✄바다 이야기 무료 다운로드↮마카오 카지노 갬블러☴포커 베팅 방법ν먹튀 없는 토토
Yes. The heads of state or government of more than 130 countries have already said they will come. These include Barack Obama of the US, Xi Jinping of China, Narendra Modi of India, Angela Merkel of Germany and David Cameron of the UK. have as yet pulled out as a result of the terrorist attacks on Paris, and security has been stepped up as an assurance. Unlike the Copenhagen talks, however, at which world leaders turned up at the last minute of the two weeks of talks to find their negotiating teams in chaos and without a clear agreement for them to sign, this time the leaders will arrive at the beginning of the conference, give their negotiating teams clear instructions, and expect a fully formed agreement at the end of it.
On behalf of the French government, the conference will be led by foreign minister Laurent Fabius, and environment minister Segolene Royal, but the French president Francois Hollande will also play a key role. They are all confident that a deal can be made.
바카라사이트◐-코인카지노-╔마카오 환전『카지노 슬롯 머신 확률』➛（스포츠 조이 라이브）╣과일 슬롯 머신⇥레드썬카지노➴내국인 카지노♩카지노 게임방법◐포커 플래시 게임
The key question now is over security. With the French capital under recent attack, and reports of fresh assaults averted by the armed forces, the atmosphere in Paris will be unlike any city that has hosted major international talks before. Security will be paramount - the French police and army will be on the streets, and the venue will be patrolled by uniformed UN guards - but the atrocities of 13 November will hang heavily on all delegates. This may mean that when world leaders attend private meetings, terrorism is discussed before climate change. But it may also mean that delegates are under more pressure than ever to come up with a deal, given the tragic circumstances surrounding them.바카라사이트홀덤 카페☷썬 시티♨（카지노 여자）토토 사다리 사이트✑토토 사이트 총판↿무료 룰렛 게임√마닐라 cod⇛카지노사이트-바카라하는곳-오션 파라다이스 7ケ말레이시아 카지노♐﹛우리카지노 주소﹜텍사스 홀덤ナ토토사이트◘마카오 카지노 에이전시▷안전놀이터◆바카라사이트바카라 분석기바카라 돈 따는 법┹풀팟➛〖정선 카지노 후기〗사다리 먹튀◄방콕 카지노✒ok 카지노☼트럼프카지노➧카지노 먹튀♮마닐라 카지노 후기ο﹝새만금 카지노﹞포커 하는 법↩인터넷바카라⇌카지노 칩▧슬롯머신 게임→바카라 확률─무료 바다 이야기 게임♭﹝마닐라 카지노 롤링﹞마카오 픽⇞사이판 카지노 후기↶카지노 솔루션┎빠찡코 게임ヘ텍사스 홀덤 족보⇩온라인바둑이게임⊙《먹튀 커뮤니티》파라다이스 게임↰바카라 고수☁호텔카지노 사이트▶놀이터 검증 사이트↷-솔레어카지노-바둑이게임-더킹카지노-바카라 보는곳╀온카 먹튀╤〖사설토토사이트〗세부 카지노α바카라 룰▨바카라 배팅⇗네임드 사다리 토토☼바카라사이트바카라사이트카지노사이트바카라 필승전략마카오 카지노 여자마카오 카지노 여자대만 카지노바카라사이트마카오 카지노 대박◦온라인 카지노 커뮤니티◎﹛바카라 무료 머니﹜홀덤카페➴바다이야기★파칭코☪야마토 게임 다운♛바카라 후기
If nations can meet and agree equitable goals on the climate, in these circumstances, it will be a triumph for international cooperation, for our wellbeing and security, and for faith in the future, in the face of forces who wish to destroy all three.